• I'm the representative, i.e., head of the managing board of PCI Network Science.
• I'm a member of the Direction Committee of IXXI, Lyon's Institute of Complex Systems, since 2019
• I'm an elected member of the Steering Committee of the French Chapter of the Complex System Society, since 2023
• I'm an elected member of the Laboratory Council of LIRIS Laboratory, the largest computer science laboratory in Lyon, since 2020
• I'm in charge of the website and seminars of the Data Mining and Machine Learning Team at LIRIS Lab. I was deputy-head of the team in 2022 and 2023.

I'm also in charge of several lectures:

• (Since 2022) Data Mining, at Lyon 1 University, M2 Data Science
• (Since 2022) Machine Learning, at Lyon 1 University, International M2 DISS
• (Since 2021)Réseaux et Scientométrie, at Lyon 1 University (M2 in Information Science).
• (Since 2019)Complex Networks, at ENS de Lyon (Complex Systems Master Program)
• (Since 2019)Network Analysis, at Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne. (M2 in Economy)
• (Since 2018) Projets informatiques at the computer science department, Lyon 1 university (L3).

Journal Editor

PCI Network Science (representative, managing board member, recommender) Advances in Complex Systems (Associate Editor)

---

Conference Organization

EGC 2023 (Lyon, France, Challenge Chair) CCS 2021 (Lyon, Web co-chair) SOCINFO 2020 (Pisa, Workshop co-chair)

---

Guest Editor,(Special Venues)

OSNEM: Dynamics ON/OF social networks OSNEM: Network Properties and Dynamics

---

Workshop orgnaization

Graph Embedding and Mining 2020 Graph Embedding and Mining 2019 Graph embedding Day 2018 DYNO 2018 OSNeD 2018 DYNO 2017 SOCIONET 2016 DYNO 2016

Conferences

Complex Networks 2023 ECML-PKDD 2023 Complex Networks 2022 ECML-PKDD 2022 BCCA 2021 Complex Networks 2021 ECML-PKDD 2021 Complex Networks 2020 IJCAI 2020 ECML-PKDD 2020 Complex Networks 2019 MARAMI 2019 ECML-PKDD 2019 MARAMI 2018 Complex Networks 2018 ALGOTEL 2018 Complex Networks 2017 MARAMI 2016 MARAMI 2015 MARAMI 2017 MARAMI 2014

---

Workshops

ACIIDS 2024 GEM 2021 NMLA 2020 LEG 2019 GOODTECHS 2019 (OSN track) CODA 2019 TD-LSG 2018 DASMIS 2017 DYNO 2015 SOCIALCOMNET 2012

Network science / Social Networks
Journal Of Complex Networks Applied Network Science IEEE TNSE SNAM OSNeM Web Intelligence

---

Data Science/Machine Learning
ACM TKDD IEEE TKDE EPJ Data Science IEEE Big Data Machine Learning Discover Data Frontiers in Big Data ESWA EAAI

---

Complexity Science
Advances in Complex Systems Chaos Ecological complexity

---

Computer Science (Misc.)
DMTCS IEEE TNSM Future Generation Computer Systems IEEE TPDS IEEE TCSS KAIS Computer communications The Computer Journal Information Science IEEE TII Concurrency and Computation: P.E.

---

Physics (Misc.)
Physica A EPJB

---

Science, Misc.
PloS One Scientific Reports Nature Climate Change

---

MDPI
Information Algorithms Symmetry Entropy Computers

---

Special issues, conferences (External Reviewer)
IJCAI 2019 WWW 2019 WWW 2017 ICSEC 2017 ESNAM 2017 HyperText 2014
ESSA JIMIS - Graph/Networks IJITDM

---

Grant agencies
CONICYT ANR 2018

---

Note: Some publishers allow to get recognition for reviews done, for instance Elsevier: Reviewer Profile

---

Or, more recently, via Publons

---

Note: Accepting to write a review is sometimes a difficult choice: the limit between a "predatory"/"junk" publisher and a new, disruptive journal can be hard to precisely define. Because I'm not satisfied with the current existing system of publication in science, I decided to accept to write reviews for journals I don't know beforehand if: 1)It does not look too fishy, 2)The article is well related to my research, 3)The review process looks professionnal.
The question particularly arises for MDPI journals. My experience is that, for those journals, the reviewing process looks as serious as most journals, and more serious than some. (I'm not talking about submitted article quality, which is a different problem). There are clearly too many of them and their businness model encourages poor quality publications, certainly. But on the peer review process, I have the impression that they are at the same level than many average well established journals.
Lately, I started to receive too many review requests, so I also started to refuse reviewing articles even if they are related to my research if they come from journals I don't have a positive opinion of, in a busy time.